Skip to content

Guessing the Killer

May 2, 2010

Perry Mason still When I get a little afraid to admit just how many hours I’ve spent watching cop shows and courtroom dramas, I just add up all the hours spent reading, which is impossible, I suppose, and then I feel better. Because even loving popular culture the way I do, I still worry that what my elementary school teachers told me is true: TV will rot my brain.

Here I am, still intact in the higher functioning way. I must still have a few capable synapses. So since I’ve made it with all these years of television viewership under my belt, I’d like to spend a little time looking at one sliver of television narrative: the giveaway shot.

As Snarky’s Machine already covered the tropes of detective procedurals, I want to give some due to the camera action that does what foreshadowing did for Mary Shelley. It’s usually less than a second, sometimes is accompanied by dialogue, but mostly not. I like to think it’s something TV picked up from Alfred Hitchcock, because he really started the quick cuts and shots that we have come to expect in suspenseful storytelling. Psycho gave us The Shower Scene, and nobody (and I mean nobody) had ever spliced together so many quick snips of film in one tight, 2-minute sequence before. It was shocking to audiences in 1960.

Okay, so we’re down with the idea of being able to see and register quick shots of the camera, we’ve been trained into it with 50+ years of cinema and television giving us this device.

Nearly every episode of Murder, She Wrote is handed to the audience on a silver platter with the quick cut sitting in a pile of lettuce. A shot of a scratched up lock. An album cover with a picture of hands on a piano, both of which belong to someone in that episode. A quick glance at a watch with mention that it keeps running 5 minutes fast.

Many of these quick shots come from a wonderful history of the small clue, a.k.a. the red herring. Agatha Christie was fond of these, often letting Hercule Poirot deliver the line, “but that was just a red herring.” As such, we avid armchair detectives realize these 1- and 2-second glances for what they are: dots on the deduce by numbers page, with a few nonsense points thrown in here and there for good measure. Whereas Christie buried many of the most critical clues in pages and pages of stilted, sometimes off-putting dialogue, television makes them more plain.

The next time the camera cuts to broken coffeepot, the unlit pipe, the uneven planters at the end of the walkway, or the squeaky floorboard, suspect right away that it will figure into whoever gets killed in minute 22. Unless it’s the first season of The Closer, because those writers clearly have watched a lot of detective dramas.

Advertisement
10 Comments leave one →
  1. May 2, 2010 5:09 pm

    The next time the camera cuts to broken coffeepot, the unlit pipe, the uneven planters at the end of the walkway, or the squeaky floorboard, suspect right away that it will figure into whoever gets killed in minute 22. Unless it’s the first season of The Closer, because those writers clearly have watched a lot of detective dramas.

    Don’t forget a gas gauge in a rusted out pick up.

    This was wonderful and hilarious.

  2. evmaroon permalink
    May 2, 2010 5:49 pm

    Don’t forget a gas gauge in a rusted out pick up.

    You mean like in the middle of Times Square on May Day? Yes, gas gauges are legendary, as are clock faces attached to explosive devices. I think I’m paraphrasing Hitchcock here: A conversation between two men about a baseball game is not at all interesting unless you know there’s a bomb under their table.

  3. May 2, 2010 7:09 pm

    A conversation between two men about a baseball game is not at all interesting unless you know there’s a bomb under their table.

    HAHAH. That is the gospel.

  4. May 2, 2010 8:59 pm

    Haha. This was good. And I love that quote!

  5. May 2, 2010 9:46 pm

    Learning about Chekhov’s gun nearly ruined these shows for me. Except that — as Snarky has told us — you can guess the killer based on how famous the guest star is.

  6. May 2, 2010 11:29 pm

    This just in: Robert Loggia is always the killer.

  7. evmaroon permalink
    May 3, 2010 2:01 am

    BWAHAHAHA! Or Michael Ironsides.

  8. Heather Flescher permalink
    May 3, 2010 2:37 am

    clock faces attached to explosive devices

    Yes! That’s always gotten me. The bomber puts together their device, and in most cases they have no reason to want anyone else to be able to look at the bomb and know how long it is before it goes off. But they always put a handy clock face right out there where we can see it, which (in the post-Hitchcock era) is a brightly glowing red digital readout 99 times out of a hundred. I know they’re available in other colors, but bombers prefer red. And it even beeps conveniently once per second, to make it more suspenseful.

  9. evmaroon permalink
    May 3, 2010 5:40 pm

    @Heather: I know, the red digital numbers that are an accurate representation of the time to explosion crack me up every time. And the digital ticking noise. Wow. I don’t think bombs really act this way. It’s the main reason that for me, The Hurt Locker was such a tense movie to watch. I now think those tropes are there to comfort the audience.

  10. May 3, 2010 9:13 pm

    I love how bombs on TV still effin’ tick, despite that not being a realistic reflection for nearly two decades.

    Also, apparently there are better ways to fuse the business together besides duct tape and silly string.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59 other followers